Pedagogical strategy to promote ethics and profesional responsability in engineering curricula

Autores/as

  • Ricardo Abad Barros Castro Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • Gabriel Alfonso Suárez Medina Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26507/paper.2585

Palabras clave:

ethics, engineering currcula, pedagogical strategy, projects' design, measures, workshops, interdisciplinary

Resumen

During several decades, engineering was considered a morally and ethically neutral profession. Therefore, it was assumed that reflections about ethics and moral were not necessary. Consequently, questions have been outlined to include ethics in engineering curricula. These questions have been developed slowly in the last decades with the imperative need of designing an ethical framework to inform technical decisions that engineers make in project management. Associated with this issue, some curricular guidance have been found. The first one is based on the educational framework for curricular design named CDIO (conceive, design, implement, operate). CDIO initiative establishes that in the curriculum should be explicit, the promotion of ethics, social responsibility, integrity, professional behavior, staying current on the world of engineering, a commitment to work embracing equity, diversity, and teamwork.

The second guidance refers to the field of accreditation board – ABET. ABET declares that students are expected to know and be able to do some knowledge, skills, and behaviors associated to their progress in the program. In particular, an expected student outcome is related to the ability for recognizing ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering context and make informed judgments considering global, economic, environmental, and societal backgrounds.

Previous studies guide the “ought to” mode curricula related to ethics. Literature has acknowledged several challenges to carry out that mode: unsystematic implementation of ethics, the low weight given to this subject in the curriculum, the low familiarity with the theoretical knowledge in ethics, instructors’ difficulties to structure a comprehensive, theoretical and practical framework, among others.

Considering this background, the School of Engineering at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ) has made curricular reflections for designing a pedagogical strategy focused on ethics and social responsibility. This strategy involves several milestones, such as: shared reflections between the faculty of Engineering and the Center of Teological Formation to design educational activities, a systematic “roadmap” to approach ethics issues in the program, the strengthening of ethics reflections in mandatory disciplinary courses, the inclusion of voluntary workshops to explore and identify values among students, the promotion of ethics and social and professional responsibilities in designing engineering projects, and the proposal of quantitative and qualitative measures to reflect about students’ progress in the field of moral and ethics.

In this context, the paper introduces some literature considerations about ethics in engineering education. Then, it presents the conceptual and methodological framework that underlies the pedagogical strategy. After that, the designed strategy is described. Finally, some reflections about the implementation and future work are discussed.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Ricardo Abad Barros Castro, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Profesor Asistente (T), Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial

Citas

ABET. (2022). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Retrieved on: May 24th, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/

Bielefeldt, A., Canney, N. (2015). Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students over Time. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 22, pp. 1535-1551.

Canney, N., Bielefeldt, A. (2012). A Model for the Development of Personal and Professional Social Responsibility for Engineers. American Society for Engineering Education.

CDIO. (2022). What is CDIO? Retrieved on: May 24th, http://www.cdio.org/

Jambon, M., Smetana, J. (2015). Theories of Moral Development. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, second edition, volume 15.

Kohlberg, L. (1992). Psicología del Desarrollo Moral. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer, 1992.

León O., Suárez G. (2013). Dilemas morales: Una estrategia pedagógica para el desarrollo de la conciencia moral. Siglo del hombre Editores. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá.

Martin, D., Conlon, E., Bowe, B. (2021). A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 27, No. 60, pp. 59-60.

Meza J., Suárez G. (2006). Formación de la conciencia moral: desafío para la educación superior. Revista Actualidades Pedagógicas. Facultad de Educación. Universidad De La Salle. No. 49. Julio-diciembre, pp. 23-32.

Rest, J. (1986). Moral Development. Advances in Research and Theory. New York, Praeger.

Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., Leelakulthanit, O. (1994). A Cross-cultural Study of Moral Philosophies, Ethical Perceptions and Judgements: A Comparison of American and Thai Marketers. International Marketing Review, Vol., 11, No. 6, pp. 65-78

Descargas

Publicado

07-09-2022

Cómo citar

[1]
R. A. Barros Castro y G. A. . Suárez Medina, «Pedagogical strategy to promote ethics and profesional responsability in engineering curricula », EIEI ACOFI, sep. 2022.

Evento

Sección

Buenas prácticas sobre ética en ingeniería
Estadísticas de artículo
Vistas de resúmenes
Vistas de PDF
Descargas de PDF
Vistas de HTML
Otras vistas
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo