Assessment by learning outcomes, an approach to measure the capabilities and skills of the topographic and geomatic engineer of the Universidad del Quindío

Authors

  • Julián Garzón Universidad del Quindío
  • José Joaquín Vila Ortega Universidad del Quindío
  • Carlos Alberto Hurtado Bedoya Universidad del Quindío

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26507/paper.4429

Keywords:

Active learning, Assessment, continuous improvement

Abstract

In accordance with Decree 1330 of 2019 and the guidelines of the National Accreditation Council (CNA), higher education institutions in Colombia must design academic programs centered on learning outcomes (LOs), aligned with the graduate profile and the needs of the sector. In this context, the Topographic and Geomatic Engineering program at the University of Quindío has been adopting a learning-oriented approach focused on LOs, with the aim of ensuring the relevance of the training and the coherence between the degree awarded and the demands of the professional environment.

This paper presents a strategy developed by a group of faculty members in the program, based on the measurement of the program’s LOs. The strategy organizes the monitoring of students’ abilities and skills across three levels: semesters 1–3, 4–6, and 7–10. This structure will make it possible to demonstrate progressive advancement in the development of technical, analytical, and ethical competencies, viewing assessment as an integral, continuous, and coherent process aligned with the LOs of each academic course, the program’s graduate profile, and continuous improvement criteria. The implementation of this strategy strengthens quality assurance and enables timely curricular adjustments in response to changes in the professional environment and the challenges of engineering education.

References

Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050

Muñoz, I., & Palacio, C. (2017). Evaluación de competencias en educación superior: Retos y experiencias. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 29(74), 23–36.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: Arevision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman

Consejo Nacional de Acreditación (CNA). (2022). Nota orientadora: ¿Cómo formular e implementar los resultados de aprendizaje? https://www.cna.gov.co

Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). (2020). Marco Nacional de Cualificaciones para Colombia. https://www.dnp.gov.co

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). (2019). Decreto 1330 de 2019. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co

Universidad del Quindío. (2022). Proyecto educativo del programa de Ingeniería Topográfica y Geomática. Armenia. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://ecm.uniquindio.edu.co/descarga.php?oid=8408185a-aa38-4c62-af52-010b5ee2bd9c;1.0

How to Cite

[1]
J. Garzón, J. J. Vila Ortega, and C. A. Hurtado Bedoya, “Assessment by learning outcomes, an approach to measure the capabilities and skills of the topographic and geomatic engineer of the Universidad del Quindío”, EIEI ACOFI, Sep. 2025.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2025-09-08
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Escanea para compartir
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo