Assessment by learning outcomes, an approach to measure the capabilities and skills of the topographic and geomatic engineer of the Universidad del Quindío
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26507/paper.4429Keywords:
Active learning, Assessment, continuous improvementAbstract
In accordance with Decree 1330 of 2019 and the guidelines of the National Accreditation Council (CNA), higher education institutions in Colombia must design academic programs centered on learning outcomes (LOs), aligned with the graduate profile and the needs of the sector. In this context, the Topographic and Geomatic Engineering program at the University of Quindío has been adopting a learning-oriented approach focused on LOs, with the aim of ensuring the relevance of the training and the coherence between the degree awarded and the demands of the professional environment.
This paper presents a strategy developed by a group of faculty members in the program, based on the measurement of the program’s LOs. The strategy organizes the monitoring of students’ abilities and skills across three levels: semesters 1–3, 4–6, and 7–10. This structure will make it possible to demonstrate progressive advancement in the development of technical, analytical, and ethical competencies, viewing assessment as an integral, continuous, and coherent process aligned with the LOs of each academic course, the program’s graduate profile, and continuous improvement criteria. The implementation of this strategy strengthens quality assurance and enables timely curricular adjustments in response to changes in the professional environment and the challenges of engineering education.
References
Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at University. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050
Muñoz, I., & Palacio, C. (2017). Evaluación de competencias en educación superior: Retos y experiencias. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 29(74), 23–36.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: Arevision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman
Consejo Nacional de Acreditación (CNA). (2022). Nota orientadora: ¿Cómo formular e implementar los resultados de aprendizaje? https://www.cna.gov.co
Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). (2020). Marco Nacional de Cualificaciones para Colombia. https://www.dnp.gov.co
Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). (2019). Decreto 1330 de 2019. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co
Universidad del Quindío. (2022). Proyecto educativo del programa de Ingeniería Topográfica y Geomática. Armenia. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://ecm.uniquindio.edu.co/descarga.php?oid=8408185a-aa38-4c62-af52-010b5ee2bd9c;1.0
How to Cite
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Proceeding
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Ingeniería - ACOFI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |


