State of the art of phytoremediation with artificial wetlands of surface runoff water in agricultural

Authors

  • Yuly Sánchez Universidad Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito
  • María Narváez Universidad de Cartagena
  • Édgar Quiñones Universidad de Cartagena
  • Mehrab Mehrab Toronto Metropolitan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26507/paper.4287

Keywords:

nitrogen, non-invasive, pesticide, phosphorus, phytoremediation

Abstract

This study addresses the issue of surface runoff of pesticides from agricultural activities, which poses a significant threat to water systems and public health, particularly in rural areas. Although agriculture is a vital source of employment, income, and food security for millions of Colombians, it is essential to incorporate principles of sustainability into this activity, considering social, environmental, and economic aspects.

One of the main impacts on water bodies is the increase in nutrient concentrations, especially nitrogen and phosphorus. This accumulation promotes the excessive growth of algae and other aquatic plants, which hinders the proper penetration of sunlight into the water. As a result, dissolved oxygen levels decrease, which can lead to the death of fish and other aquatic organisms due to oxygen depletion. Implementing phytoremediation through constructed wetlands is a process that uses plants to clean, decontaminate, or restore soil and water by taking advantage of their ability to absorb, degrade, or neutralize chemical pollutants in the environment. This technique offers a sustainable alternative for the remediation of contaminated areas, using the natural detoxification processes of plants and relying on native, non-invasive species. This system will enable farmers to make use of available natural resources while promoting community involvement in protecting water resources. Additionally, it will facilitate the adoption of technology to address pesticide contamination effectively and sustainably in agriculture.

Author Biography

Yuly Sánchez, Universidad Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito

Cundinamarca - zipaquira

References

Cárdenas, D., Baptiste, M. P., & Castaño, N. (2017). Plantas exóticas con alto potencial de invasión en Colombia. Bogotá: Minambiente. Retrieved from https://repository.humboldt.org.co/server/api/core/bitstreams/1b4cfe7d-9271-4b4a-b30f-8f4d65b4b135/content (Accesed on 30 March 2025).

Pivetz, B. E. (2001). Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and ground at hazardous waste sites. Obtenido de https://books.google.com.co/books?hl=es&lr=&id=fXSugnKAha0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&ots=bhHWnwk9bn&sig=IXWT22HqjGig4947aHKJRgQuLtE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false (Accesed on 14 April 2025).

Díaz F., O. A. (February de 2012). Agricultural pollutant removal by constructed wetlands: Implications for water management and design. Agricultural Water Management, 171-183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.12.012 (Accesed on 4 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.12.012

Haiming W., Z. J. (2015). A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Design and operation, Bioresource, Technology, 594-601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.068 (Accesed on 1 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.068

Kafle A., T. A. (2022). Mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents. Environmental Advances, 2666-7657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203 (Accesed on 2 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203

Karki, K. (2024). Review on applicability of constructed wetlands in the South Asian region focusing on roles of media, macrophytes, microbes, pre-treatment and post-treatment. Urban Water Journal, 1043-1055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2024.2397789 (Accesed on 5 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2024.2397789

Khan, A. W. (2022). Phytoremediation of pollutants from wastewater: A concise review. Open Life Sciences, 17(1), 488-496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0056 (Accesed on 8 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1515/biol-2022-0056

Khatoon X., O. M. (2024). Microbial Contributions to Heavy Metal Phytoremediation in Agricultural Soils. A Review. Microorganisms. doi:10.3390/microorganisms12101945 (Accesed on 10 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12101945

Lee Ch., F. T. (2008). Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systms. 11-22. doi:10.1002/elsc.200800049 (Accesed on 4 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200800049

Li, J. Z. (2021). The Use of Constructed Wetland for Mitigating Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Agricultural Runof. 476. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040476 (Accesed on 14 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040476

Luke, F. D. (September de 2024). An integrated mitigation approach to diffuse agricultural water pollution–a scoping review. Dublin, Ireland. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1340565 (Accesed on 10 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1340565

Mahdi, F. K.-A. (2024). A review of the constructed wetland systems for wastewater treatmen. In AIP Conference Proceedings. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0213208 (Accesed on 10 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0213208

McCalla LB, P. B. (2022). Effectiveness of a Constructed Wetland with Carbon Filtration in Reducing Pesticides Associated with Agricultural Runoff. Archive of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 317-329. doi:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00244-021-00909-0 (Accesed on 14 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-021-00909-0

Rahman ME., B. H. (2020). Design, Operation and Optimization of Constructed Wetland for Removal of Pollutant. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228339 (Accesed on 11 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228339

Redfern L., G. C. (2016). Endophytic Phytoaugmentation. Treating Wastewater and Runoff Through Augmented Phytoremediation, 83-90. doi: 10.1089/ind.2015.0016 (Accesed on 12 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2015.0016

Sheng H., L. L.-B. (2006). Effects of effluent recirculation in vertical flow constructed wetland on. Water Sci. Technol, 137-146. doi:https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.845 (Accesed on 11 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.845

Tan W., P. L. (2023). A state-of-the-art of phytoremediation approach for sustainable management of heavy metals recovery. Environmental Technology and Innovation. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2023.103043 (Accesed on 9 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103043

Wang, M. Z. (2018). Application of constructed wetlands for treating agricultural runoff and agro-industrial wastewater. Hydrobiology, 1-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3315-z (Accesed on 5 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3315-z

Zoya Ghori, H. I.-u.-M. (2016). Phytoextraction: The Use of Plants to Remove Heavy Metals from Soil. Plant Metal Interaction, 385-409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803158-2.00015-1 (Accesed on 9 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803158-2.00015-1

Fernandes, F. M. (2017). Evaluating Macrophyte Selection And Germination Protocols To Enhance Nutrient Sequestration In Engineered Wetland Models. Ryerson University, Toronto. Recuperado el April de 2025, de https://www.torontomu.ca/content/dam/mccarthy-research-lab/pdf/Tucci-Thesis-2021.pdf (Accesed on 4 April 2025). https://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14647818

Tiley, M. (2013). Typha Latifolia Response to Oligotrophic and Eutrophic Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loading Rates Under Laboratory Conditions. Toronto. Recuperado el 6 de April de 2025, de ttps://www.torontomu.ca/content/dam/mccarthy-research-lab/pdf/Tiley-Thesis-2013.pdf (Accesed on 8 April 2025).

Delgadillo, A. C. (2011). Depuración de aguas residuales por medio de humedales artíficiales. https://www.aguasresiduales.info/revista/libros/depuracion-de-aguas-residuales-por-medio-de-humedales-artificiales (Accesed on 4 April 2025).

Nature, C. (2024). Small Wetlands, Big Benefit: How to Harness Nature to Filter Agriculture Runoff. Retrieved April 1st, 2025, from https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/illinois/stories-in-illinois/constructed-wetlands-reduce-agricultural-runoff-study/: https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/illinois/stories-in-illinois/constructed-wetlands-reduce-agricultural-runoff-study/ (Accesed on 11 April 2025).

Schilling, M. (2021). Study Shows Constructed Wetlands Are Best Protection for Agricultural Runoff Into Waterways. https://www.agriculture.com/crops/conservation/study-shows-constructed-wetlands-are-best-protection-for-agricultural-runoff-into (Accesed on 15 April 2025).

Torckzon, M. (2005). The Use of Constructed Wetlands to Treat Effluent. Recuperado el 2nd de April de 2025, de https://home.engineering.iastate.edu/~tge/ce421-521/mtorczon.pdf: https://home.engineering.iastate.edu/~tge/ce421-521/mtorczon.pdf (Accesed on 14 April 2025).

vermont, D. o. (2024). https://dec.vermont.gov/watershed/wetlands/functions/water-quality. Recuperado el 1st de April de 2025, de https://www.vermont.gov/: https://dec.vermont.gov/watershed/wetlands/functions/water-quality (Accesed on 4 April 2025).

How to Cite

[1]
Y. Sánchez, M. Narváez, Édgar Quiñones, and M. Mehrab, “State of the art of phytoremediation with artificial wetlands of surface runoff water in agricultural”, EIEI ACOFI, Sep. 2025.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-08

Proceeding

Section

Calidad del agua y saneamiento básico
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Escanea para compartir
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo